GPT Image 2.5
Image Generator
A free online GPT Image 2.5 image generator. Sharper detail, precise edits, faster runs. First image free: no account, no card.
Twelve GPT Image 2.5 frames collected in the open-source awesome-gpt-image-2.5-prompts index and credited there to their authors · not our generations. The prompt on each card is a working recipe for that job, written here.
Which GPT Image 2.5 model should you use?
Flare for almost everything, Sunburst when the detail is the point. Same price per image; ChatGPT picks for you and never says which.
same prompt Create a photorealistic candid photograph of an elderly sailor standing on a small fishing boat. Weathered skin with visible wrinkles, pores and sun texture. Shot like a 35mm film photograph, medium close-up at eye level, using a 50mm lens.

Fast
gpt-image-2.5-flare
Image quality comparable to GPT Image 2, at 50% lower latency.
- Latency, Standard 1K
- ~4s
- Quality vs GPT Image 2
- comparable
- Cost per image
- $0.0132
- Precise editing
- improved
- Subject preservation
- improved
Reach for it for social posts, drafts, volume and anything you plan to iterate on.

Think
gpt-image-2.5-sunburst
Higher image quality than GPT Image 2 — the only one of the two models OpenAI makes that claim for.
- Latency, Standard 1K
- ~11s
- Quality vs GPT Image 2
- higher
- Cost per image
- $0.0132
- Precise editing
- improved
- Subject preservation
- improved
Reach for it for campaign creative, product retouching and long edit chains. Same price as Flare — you trade about seven seconds, nothing else.
Only true here
ChatGPT and Codex will not let you choose
Flare and Sunburst are separate models only in the API. Inside ChatGPT and Codex there is no picker — and no way to find out which one ran. Here it is a toggle: same prompt, two models, side by side.
“I'm using the API. I don't think you can select it in Codex.r/codex, launch-week thread
Two API models, not two price tiers — the difference is how long you wait for the ceiling. OpenAI’s own published run of one prompt through both · cited, not ours
Using the GPT Image 2.5 image generator free, online
Nothing to install and nothing to sign. Your first GPT Image 2.5 image each day is free, in the browser you already have.
- 1 / 1free today
- no card
- no email
- no waitlist
One free image a day
1024×1024 at Standard, with a small corner mark. Nothing is asked for first.
- gptimage25.top
A weathered brass compass on a folded nautical chart, morning window light
GenerateOnline, in the browser you have
No install, no app, no queue. Type a prompt, pick Flare or Sunburst, press Generate.
- Model
- gpt-image-2.5-flare
- Quality
- standard
- Size
- 1024×1024
- Time
- 4.1s
A receipt names the model
So you can check you got GPT Image 2.5 and not something cheaper wearing its name.
- 30credits now
+6 every day you check in
- No corner mark
- History you can delete
Sign in — still free, still no card
The daily one becomes a balance, and the corner mark comes off every image.
One image a day without an account; signing in raises it to 30 credits plus 6 a day and drops the mark. Failed, timed-out and moderation-blocked runs are never charged either way. Every limit and every right you get with the file is written out on the free page.
Independent interface to OpenAI’s API · not a free ChatGPT account
What is GPT Image 2.5?
OpenAI’s image family, shipped 8 September 2026: Flare fast, Sunburst precise. ChatGPT Images 2.5 in the app, gpt-image-2.5 in the API.
- Sept 8, 2026Released
- Up to 50%Lower latency on Flare
- One elementPrecise single-element edits
- Multi-turnEarlier edits survive later ones
- ReferencesFaces and products carry through
- xhigh + maxTwo quality tiers above high
- 3840×2160Native 4K
- $0.0132Standard 1K, either model
- ChatGPT
Every tier, free included. Won't say which model ran, and won't let you pick.
- Codex
In your dev workflow, included with your plan. Same limitation — no model picker.
- OpenAI API
Both models, every parameter, from $0.0059 an image. Needs Organization Verification.
- This page
Both models, a model-ID receipt, Keep-Intact editing. First image free, then credits.
Two quality tiers above high for the first time. Every frame here is GPT Image 2.5 output published by OpenAI · cited, not generated by this image generator
Ten frames out of the GPT Image 2.5 image generator, no cherry-picking
Ten consecutive frames, nothing thrown away — each at the size it came back at, not cropped to line up.
- No login for your first
- Native 4K
- Model-ID receipt

A tagline, set inside the picture 
Geometry that stays square 
Depth that survives the dark 
Dense ornamental type 
Scale that reads as scale

Photographic skin and fabric 
A period, not a filter 
Flat colour, hard edge 
Tile by tile, no mush 
Colour without banding

A tagline, set inside the picture 
Depth that survives the dark 
Tile by tile, no mush 
Scale that reads as scale

Photographic skin and fabric 
Flat colour, hard edge 
Colour without banding

A period, not a filter 
Geometry that stays square 
Dense ornamental type
A gallery where every image is the same shape has had a selection pass applied · GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst output published by OpenAI, cited, not ours
What got better in GPT Image 2.5
OpenAI’s announcement lists four. Here is what each one changes once your images are a job — and all four are live in the generator above.
Try these on your own prompt
The printGPT Image 2.5
01Reference fidelity
Your subject survives the trip
Hand it a reference and your subject arrives in the new scene still recognisable — same face, same label, same finish. The product in the ad stays the product in the box.
One of five before-and-after pairs published by OpenAI
SourceOne edit
02Precision editing
It understands what not to change
Change one element and the composition, subject and brand treatment around it stay put. Higgsfield's Head of Product: "how well it understands what not to change."
Prompt: "make the bed" — everything else in the room is untouched
SourceAfter the chain
03Multi-turn consistency
Edit chains hold up longer
Long chains hold together where GPT Image 2 came apart. A developer in r/codex: "after 2–3 edits the image was often unusable… This seems much better now." Improved, not solved.
Three supplied garments onto one photograph — face, pose, gallery and floor untouched

04Layouts, text, transparency
Denser layouts and native 4K
More factually correct text in the frame, native 4K at 3840×2160 and true transparent backgrounds. 4K is a size setting — asking the model to "upscale to 4K" does nothing.
Native 3840×2160 · transparency on the Background chip, Starter and above
Every frame in this band is GPT Image 2.5 output published by OpenAI · cited, not ours
Four things GPT Image 2.5 does here that ChatGPT will not
Not our tagline — a paying ChatGPT user wrote it out explaining his refund. All four are in the generator above, on the free tier.

Your file 
Edit #4 01Every edit starts from your original
ChatGPT re-edits its own last output and quality falls away by the second pass. Here, edit #4 is computed from the file you uploaded.

Source 
5 ticked 02Keep-Intact checkboxes
OpenAI's guide says to write "change only X" and list what must survive. Almost nobody types it — you tick five boxes instead.

flare 
sunburst 03The model ID, printed
ChatGPT will not tell you which model drew your picture. One prompt, two models — look at these two and try to pick. Every result here carries the exact model string the API returned.

v1 
v2 · both kept 04Nothing you make gets overwritten
One image, replaced irrecoverably by your next retry — that is ChatGPT. Here every run is a new row you can branch from.
Complaints quoted fromcommunity.openai.com · edits degradecommunity.openai.com · the refund threadr/ChatGPT · "how do I know I've got it" threadscommunity.openai.com · image history
Quotations are verbatim, with their threads linked · we are not OpenAI
How to use the GPT Image 2.5 AI image generator
Three steps, and the first image needs no account. Describe it, pick Fast or Think, then read the receipt under the result.
Describe it, or drop an image in
Type a prompt, upload a reference, or scribble a sketch. Anything you want rendered as text goes in "quotation marks".
prompt Give me an ad for a brand called Thread, a hip young street brand… with the tagline "Yours to Create."
Text to ImageImage to ImagePick Fast or Think, then tick what must stay
Fast (Flare) for speed, Think (Sunburst) for the ceiling. Editing? Tick what must survive.
Ticked before this edit ran
- Face & identity
- Camera angle
- Pose & body
- Lighting
Fast / ThinkKeep-IntactGenerate, then read the receipt
Model ID, quality, size, format and seconds elapsed — printed under the image, read from the API response.
- Model
- gpt-image-2.5-flare
- Quality
- medium
- Size
- 1024×1536
- Format
- PNG
Receiptmodel ID
The receipt names the model, the quality tier, the pixel size and how long it took. No card until you choose a plan.
Six jobs people are actually using GPT Image 2.5 for
Six jobs, and the sentence that makes each one land. Every card loads a working prompt into the generator, settings already dialled in.
QUOTE THE TEXT · HD vs ULTRAPosters and packaging
Layouts where the headline and the small print both have to read. Quote every rendered word, then compare HD against Ultra before you commit.
DRAFT AT STANDARD · RE-RUN AT HDInfographics and diagrams
OpenAI names infographic accuracy and layout as a specific gain in 2.5. Check the labels, not the look — draft at Standard, re-run the winner at HD.
IMAGE TO IMAGE · TICK FACE & IDENTITYPortraits from a photo
Carry a face into a new era, wardrobe or style. Identity, pose and expression hold; only what you named changes.
THINK · KEEP LIGHTING & FRAMINGIterative product edits
Change one thing — the chairs, the label, the bottle — and the light, the framing and everything you didn't name come back exactly as they were. Sunburst is the tier built for the fourth revision, not the first.
REFERENCE FIRST · THEN RESTATE ITStoryboards and sequences
Build one reference frame first, then name its defining details again in every new scene. The repetition is the instruction, not padding.
STRUCTURE REFERENCE · not styleSketch to finished image
Draw the layout, then let the render fill it in. Say the sketch is structure, that the perspective holds, and that nothing new is added.
Half of these are a pair — what went in, and what came back. The prompt on a card is the recipe for that job rather than the caption for that frame, and no frame on this page is used twice. Want the whole tool rather than one prompt? text to image writes a picture from a sentence, image to image changes one thing in a picture you already have, and sketch to image turns a drawing into a finished render.
GPT Image 2.5 parameters, checked against OpenAI's docs today
Read off OpenAI’s image generation guide, not a competitor’s summary. Every value here is one the generator on this page will actually accept.
Sourcedevelopers.openai.com — image generation guide, read September 9, 2026
- quality
auto·low·medium·high·xhigh·max— Draft / Standard / HD / Ultra / Max in the UI- size
1024×1024·1536×1024·1024×1536·2048×2048·2048×1152·3840×2160·2160×3840· custom- background
auto·opaque·transparenton the model, and the panel's Background chip sends the third. OpenRouter's record for both 2.5 models lists two, so a transparent run goes by the direct API instead- output_format
png·jpeg·webp— JPEG returns faster than PNG- output_compression
0–100 — JPEG and WebP only, not available on PNG
- n
Images per request — 1 free · 4 on Pro · 8 on Studio
- moderation
auto·low—lowon Pro and above: fewer false blocks- partial_images
0–3. We ship
0. Each partial costs 100 extra output tokens- input_fidelity
Deprecated since GPT Image 2 — image input is always high fidelity
- Custom size rules
Each edge ≤ 3,840 px · both edges multiples of 16 · long:short ratio ≤ 3:1 · total pixels between 655,360 and 8,294,400 · anything above 2560×1440 is flagged experimental by OpenAI
What OpenAI still lists as unsolved in GPT Image 2.5
Precise text placement can miss. Character and brand consistency across separate generations can still drift. A higher quality tier does not guarantee a better result — OpenAI says so, and so do we before you spend Max credits.
Anything on this table that stops matching OpenAI's documentation, or what the image generator on this page actually accepts, is a bug. Tell us and we'll fix the page.
Where GPT Image 2.5 lands on the Arena leaderboards
Sunburst first, Flare second, on all three boards. Both sit on the toggle above, so the top-ranked one is a press away, not an upgrade.
- Sunburst #1#1Sunburst#2Flare#3Next best
- Sunburst #1#1Sunburst#2Flare#3Next best
- Sunburst #1#1Sunburst#2Flare#3Next best
1,381 → 1,421
One published figure for the release · not one per board
Elo moved from 1,381 to 1,421 — a solid incremental win, not a new category. A launch-thread commenter put it better than any marketing page: "going from 1,381 to 1,421 isn't 'destroying' the benchmark."
Switch for a 40-point Elo jump? Don't. Switch because your edits stop wrecking the parts you didn't touch — that is the reason this page exists.
SUNBURST · #1 TEXT TO IMAGEText to image, image edit and multi-image edit. The Arena is a blind human-preference vote: the least gameable number here, and still a vote. Elo from OpenAI’s Arena announcement, re-verified against the leaderboard before each update.https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-image-2.5-sunburst
Already using something else? A GPT Image 2.5 cheat sheet
One conclusion and one number per row, for anyone arriving from Midjourney, Nano Banana Pro, DALL·E or GPT Image 2 — losses included.
Quality position
- GPT Image 2
- baseline
- 2.5 Flare
- comparable to 2
- 2.5 Sunburst
- higher than 2
- Nano Banana Pro
- strong, different look
Latency
- GPT Image 2
- baseline
- 2.5 Flare
- −50%
- 2.5 Sunburst
- longer
- Nano Banana Pro
- fast
Cost, standard 1K
- GPT Image 2
- $0.0527 (old medium)
- 2.5 Flare
- $0.0132
- 2.5 Sunburst
- $0.0132
- Nano Banana Pro
- varies by host
Precise editing
- GPT Image 2
- —
- 2.5 Flare
- improved
- 2.5 Sunburst
- improved
- Nano Banana Pro
- good
Multi-turn edits
- GPT Image 2
- degrades
- 2.5 Flare
- improved
- 2.5 Sunburst
- improved
- Nano Banana Pro
- good
Transparent PNG
- GPT Image 2
- limited
- 2.5 Flare
- yes
- 2.5 Sunburst
- yes
- Nano Banana Pro
- limited
Native 4K
- GPT Image 2
- —
- 2.5 Flare
- 3840×2160
- 2.5 Sunburst
- 3840×2160
- Nano Banana Pro
- —
Text rendering
- GPT Image 2
- good
- 2.5 Flare
- good
- 2.5 Sunburst
- good, HD for small type
- Nano Banana Pro
- good
Checkerboard artifact
- GPT Image 2
- present
- 2.5 Flare
- still present
- 2.5 Sunburst
- still present, finer
- Nano Banana Pro
- not reported
The one number that surprised people
GPT Image 2.5 at Standard costs a quarter of GPT Image 2's medium tier. The founder of 12ui.com: "about 2x faster and 1/2 the cost of the old 2 medium."
Each row says what changes for you rather than which model wins in the abstract. Sample images, prompts and per-item scoring live on the comparison pages, linked from each row; the generator is the same one at the top of this page.
What the GPT Image 2.5 image generator costs here
OpenAI prices by token rather than by image: an everyday 1024×1024 at medium costs $0.0132 upstream, the same for both models.
Same credits either way — yearly just costs less per month
Or buy credits once and spend them slowly
No subscription, no renewal. Packs cost more per credit than a plan and the reason is on the label: they last twelve months, where plan credits expire at the end of the month.
- Small pack
$11.90one-time
260 credits
Works on any plan, including Free
≈ 43 standard images (or 10 at HD)
Good for 12 months
- Medium pack
$29.90one-time
800 credits
Works on any plan, including Free
≈ 133 standard images (or 33 at HD)
Good for 12 months
- Large pack
$79.90one-time
2,400 credits
Works on any plan, including Free
≈ 400 standard images (or 100 at HD)
Good for 12 months
Plan credits are always spent first, so the ones with a deadline go before the ones without.
A standard 1K image is 6 credits. Draft 3 · HD 24 · Ultra 42 · Max 96. Doubling the resolution doubles the credits; editing adds 4, covering up to four reference images.
You are never charged when a run fails, times out, is blocked by moderation, or — on Pro — visibly ignores a Keep-Intact tick. That last one is a free retry, three a day.
- 7-day refund, no questions, if you've used under 50 credits
- Failed and blocked runs never cost credits
- No card for your first image
- Cancel in two clicks · prices exclude VAT, calculated at checkout
What people who have tested GPT Image 2.5 are saying
Every quote is from a named person, linked to the original. Nothing trimmed to hide a reservation — including people who preferred a rival.

“What impressed us most about GPT-Image-2.5 Flare is how well it understands what not to change.”OpenAI's announcement · 2026-09-08

“The editing tools are a real game-changer — and, honestly, there are so many features now in Images that to say it's overcrowded would be an understatement.”TechRadar · 2026-09-08

“It does a much better job preserving the likeness of people and pets.”Axios hands-on · 2026-09-08

“I haven't noticed the same degree of quality loss when using the Image API for edits.”community.openai.com · 2026-09-08

“2.5 is the first model to genuinely improve on every test I throw at it… Flare medium seems to be the sweet spot and it's about 2x faster and 1/2 the cost of the old 2 medium.”12ui.com benchmark · 2026-09-09

“Every edit degraded the image… This seems much better now. Big improvement.”r/codex · 2026-09-09
They ran the model; none of them was sent here or paid, and there are no invented testimonials on this site. The words and the links are theirs; the star marks are ours, summarising each verdict. Portraits are illustrative where a source publishes no photograph. If a quote stops being accurate, tell us and we will pull it.
Going deeper on GPT Image 2.5
Model pickerFlare or Sunburst — which one, and why ChatGPT hides the choice
Same price per image either way. What you are actually trading is time against the ceiling — and neither ChatGPT nor Codex will let you pick.
ComparisonRead
UpgradeWhat actually changed from GPT Image 2
Four gains OpenAI names, checked one at a time — plus the price move, which is the largest change nobody put in a headline.
ComparisonRead
Head to headAgainst Nano Banana Pro — ten identical prompts, including the two we lose
No overall score. Ten jobs, the same prompt into both, and the row you care about is the only one that matters.
ComparisonRead
GPT Image 2.5 image generator: the questions people ask
Sixteen answers, and two of them do not flatter us. Cost, the free tier, commercial rights, and what the receipt under each image is for.
Is GPT Image 2.5 out?
How much does GPT Image 2.5 cost per image?
medium, $0.053 at high, and $0.211 at max, based on OpenAI's $30 per million image output tokens. Cost scales with resolution and quality, not a flat per-image fee. Batch requests are half price. Here, a standard 1K image is 6 credits — roughly $0.05 on Pro.Does GPT Image 2.5 still have the checkerboard artifact? The part other pages skip
Clouds and gradients — still visible on GPT Image 2, Flare and Sunburst alike. "It's still really noticable in clouds and plants." (r/OpenAI, 14 upvotes)
Grass, foliage and hair — mostly unchanged, though some report better hair on Sunburst. "It seems to still have that checkerboard pattern in my tests." (r/ChatGPT, 25 upvotes)
Between lines of dense text — the worst case, on both models. "The checkerboard effect behind text and other patterns is horrendous." (r/codex, 19 upvotes)
Three things help, and they are OpenAI's guidance rather than our finding: HD and above on flat subjects, PNG output, and the fewest edit rounds you can get away with.
Is the checkerboard the same thing as a fake transparent background?
Neither is a watermark. OpenAI embeds C2PA metadata and an invisible watermark; neither is a visible texture, and nobody — including us — adds a pattern to your image.
How do I know if I'm using GPT Image 2.5 and not GPT Image 2?
gpt-image-2.5-flare or gpt-image-2.5-sunburst) along with quality tier, size and generation time, and you can open the raw API response to check it yourself.Flare or Sunburst — which should I pick?
Is GPT Image 2.5 free? Do I need a ChatGPT account?
Is there a GPT Image 2.5 AI image generator I can use online, without installing anything?
Is there a watermark?
Does GPT Image 2.5 support 4K and transparent backgrounds?
3840×2160 and 2160×3840; anything above 2560×1440 is flagged experimental by OpenAI. Transparent backgrounds are native on both 2.5 models and the panel's Background chip asks for one — it needs PNG or WebP, since JPEG has no alpha channel, and it is a Starter unlock. A transparent run travels by the direct API rather than the gateway we use by default, whose record for these two models lists auto and opaque only.The catch is the model's, not ours: asked for transparency it will sometimes paint a grey-and-white checkerboard instead — a picture of transparency rather than transparency. Open the alpha channel and check, and put "no checkerboard" in the prompt.Can I use GPT Image 2.5 images commercially?
Why do my edits change things I didn't ask about?
Is GPT Image 2.5 better than Nano Banana Pro?
Can it keep the same face across edits?
Why is ChatGPT's image generation slow or limited for me?
Is GPT Image 2.5 the same as GPT Astra or Gemini 2.5 Flash Image?
Community reports collected 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-09, quoted with their vote counts · every claim on this page is re-checked daily.
Make one image with GPT Image 2.5 and check the receipt
One prompt, thirty seconds, no account for the first image. It comes back with a receipt naming the model.
- Free first image
- Flare & Sunburst
- Model-ID receipt
- Native 4K
- Commercial rights on paid
SIGN UP FREE · 1 IMAGE · 1KSIGN UP FREE · 1 IMAGE ON GPT IMAGE 2.5 · 1K · STANDARD · NO CARD
Written and maintained by Andy SwiftPublished Last updated Tool version 2026.09.1














